Re: Request For Reviewers
- From: A Programmer <youdontneedtoknow@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:25:53 -0500
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:33:25 +0200, "Kristofer Skaug"
<nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But if the author's point really cannot be made without a multi-page chunk
of source code, then you've actually got a "how-to" course which cannot be done efficiently away from a
computer anyhow.
Sometimes people have to have the examples to learn. I notice,
regarding myself in going through the Win32 documentation (an
example), that I get confused a lot of times and have to have an
example to be able to understand what is going on. On the same token,
I find I understand source by itself very little (The SWAG archive
being a good example there) because I need the explanations of what
each unfamiliar line is doing.
I think a book to be less credible without source to be able to relate
to and understand, but shouldn't use source as a substitution for
adequately explaining the topic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request For Reviewers
- From: Kristofer Skaug
- Re: Request For Reviewers
- References:
- Request For Reviewers
- From: Jon Shemitz
- Re: Request For Reviewers
- From: TObject
- Re: Request For Reviewers
- From: Atle Smelvær
- Re: Request For Reviewers
- From: somebody
- Re: Request For Reviewers
- From: Kristofer Skaug
- Request For Reviewers
- Prev by Date: Re: Request For Reviewers
- Next by Date: Re: Generics + D2007/win32
- Previous by thread: Re: Request For Reviewers
- Next by thread: Re: Request For Reviewers
- Index(es):