Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: "Fritz Huber" <fh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:26:29 +0200
Just what we need. Borlands far too few resources split between even more
platforms. No, thank you.
Ditch .NET, it's just not worth it ...
I think a mixture of compiled and dynamic languages is the way to go.
For example just yesterday I've played around with wxPython and I have to
say that I'm totally blown away by its performance, ease of use and
functionality. Definitely worth exploring.
I think I haven't had so much fun playing around with a technology for a
long time.
Getting instant results is just awesome.
This also really changes my opinion about scripting languages.
I don't care what benchmarks say. Python+Wx feels a lot quicker than any
(thick client) .NET stuff I've seen so far. I love it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Mike Margerum
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Marco van de Voort
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Uffe Kousgaard
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- References:
- native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Hans-Peter Suter
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Uffe Kousgaard
- native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- Prev by Date: Purposesoft and HTMLEdit 3.0
- Next by Date: Re: Thinking Clearly
- Previous by thread: Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- Next by thread: Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|