Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: "Uffe Kousgaard" <oh@xxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:36:26 +0200
"Fritz Huber" <fh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:448ea08d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't care what benchmarks say. Python+Wx feels a lot quicker than any
(thick client) .NET stuff I've seen so far. I love it.
This just doesn't necessarily mean it is something Borland should spend
resources on.
Stick to:
1) Native win32
2) Native win64
3) .NET
4) Kylix without visual components.
That's my wishlist. If there are still resources left, we can look at other
platforms.
Regards
Uffe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Hans-Peter Suter
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- References:
- native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Hans-Peter Suter
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Uffe Kousgaard
- Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- From: Fritz Huber
- native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- Prev by Date: Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- Next by Date: Re: Best tool to create help file from Delphi XMLDoc comments
- Previous by thread: Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- Next by thread: Re: native-code languages (slashdot) and Borland rant
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|