Re: About speed
- From: "Don Strenczewilk" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:08:58 -0400
He probably meant to say that a 15% drop in execution speed is a small
penalty to pay for his productivity increase. If not, DevCo might consider
slowing their compilers down. With a little work, they could probably make
one that works at 50% efficiency.
"Oliver Townshend" <oliveratzipdotcomdotau> wrote in message
news:449bb5dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, .NET code running only 15% slower than native is actually a pretty
good result. For me, it is a good argument in favor of converting to
.NET.
In favour? That's the weakest argument I've heard. Surely there are
other reasons?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: About speed
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: About speed
- From: Bryce K. Nielsen
- Re: About speed
- From: Tom Corey
- Re: About speed
- From: Oliver Townshend
- Re: About speed
- References:
- About speed
- From: alavna
- Re: About speed
- From: Árpád Soós
- Re: About speed
- From: Oliver Townshend
- About speed
- Prev by Date: Re: where to buy?
- Next by Date: Re: About speed
- Previous by thread: Re: About speed
- Next by thread: Re: About speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|