Re: Captain Jake's Top Ten List of what I'd like to see inthenextversionof Delphi



John Jacobson wrote:
I would prefer it to being stuck in a very old version of Delphi simply because
it would cost a substantial amount of money to upgrade the components used.

I've never thought the upgrades were substantial. I always weigh them
against how much time would it take to develop/maintain/test this
ourselves...

Besides, approximately what overall cost are you looking at? 500? 1k? 3k?

If they offered free upgrades it wouldn't be an issue. But they don't.

Many of them license their source code for just a bit more. Others
offer subscriptions.

Many of
them charge a lot for upgrades,

They do? Most offer discounted upgrades.

so that upgrading Delphi becomes a major
expense that is then priced right out of reality for most corporate development
shops with substantial pre-existing code bases.

For corporate development shops, upgrading tools is always a large
expense; most of which is in human resources having to deal with
testing, time lost due to the upgrade of tools, etc.

Your assumption here strikes me as very short sighted.

There are a lot of shops that
are looking at the cost of upgrading Delphi and comparing it to the cost of
simply moving to Visual Studio, or staying with their current version of
Delphi. The third-party components are like a millstone around Delphi's neck in
such comparisons.

VS.NET has it's own upgrade issues; they aren't immune from these
problems.

Regardless, reliance on third-party components is a development choice
and there are advantages/disadvantages to the whole build/buy argument.
IMO, if someone walks into the "buy" option without considering upgrade
costs, that's just foolish.

I do not believe backward compatibility of dcu's will help in any
substantial way to make the "buy" argument more appealing. The solution
is really simple: when buying a component, buy the source code edition.

--
Brian Moelk
Brain Endeavor LLC
bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: AirFares Make no Sense
    ... It varies somewhat if the business class seats fully ... > I have taken that route on FFM upgrade, and the last time after CO ... and the ATL/IAH roundtrip cost LESS than the IAH/CZM ...
    (rec.travel.air)
  • Re: Theory about upgrade drop offs
    ... The cost is pretty minor is a .NET product is going to ... if sales wants us to develop a .NET product -- or something ... a $5,000 upgrade is even a factor worth ... can not justify purchase an upgrade to Delphi... ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Announcing CodeGear RAD Studio 2007
    ... SA costs less for the professional SKU if there ... Pro Upgrade $590 ... those two upgrades will have cost $1650. ... each upgrade received under SA (assuming the same price ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Long Term Care Insurance
    ... never had an adjustment except for the one that they offer every 5 years or so to upgrade your coverage if you wish. ... I originally got in for the minimum that on;y cost me $1.60 per week for $80 dollar a day nursing home only coverage. ... I will upgrade it further every 5 years. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • RE: Moving from CA-MIM to GRS.
    ... onto Windows due to the cost of upgrading. ... "Windows is better, faster, CHEAPER" people by being at least reasonable ... about the upgrade fees. ... For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)