Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: "Jon Robertson" <jonrobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 11:49:57 -0700
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] wrote:
I really don't agree with this. I think that the only exception which
is not important is one you expect.
Which, by definition, really wouldn't be an exception. Unfortunately, there's no way to tell the OS or RTL/VCL which ones you're expecting. ;)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- References:
- Tasty exceptions
- From: Blackbird Crow Raven
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: GrandmasterB
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Michael C.
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Michael C.
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Michael C.
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Tasty exceptions
- Prev by Date: Re: Tasty exceptions
- Next by Date: Utility to Generate Conditional Compilation Source
- Previous by thread: Re: Tasty exceptions
- Next by thread: Re: Tasty exceptions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|