Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: "Jon Robertson" <jonrobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 12:26:29 -0700
Jon Robertson wrote:
Which, by definition, really wouldn't be an exception.
Jon Robertson also wrote:
:)
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] replied:
I think that definition of exceptions -- while common -- is so
informal as to be misleading.
Darn. Craig missed another smiley.
:-P
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- References:
- Tasty exceptions
- From: Blackbird Crow Raven
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: GrandmasterB
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Michael C.
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Michael C.
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Michael C.
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Jon Robertson
- Re: Tasty exceptions
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Tasty exceptions
- Prev by Date: Re: Captain Jake's Top Ten List of what I'd like to see in thenextversion of Delphi
- Next by Date: Re: My Top 3 Delphi wishes
- Previous by thread: Re: Tasty exceptions
- Next by thread: Re: Tasty exceptions
- Index(es):