Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: "Randy Magruder" <randy.magruder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jul 2006 14:29:10 -0700
Brian Moelk wrote:
I personally don't think continuing VCL.NET or Delphi for .NET in the
same way is "suicide". I just think they will be spending a bunch of
time/effort working on a .NET strategy that is fundamentally flawed.
You've made a few valid criticisms of VCL.NET that are technical, a few
of which could never be addressed (at least not without MS playing
ball), and a few of which CAN be addressed. But in a nutshell you are
saying that WinForms will forever and always be the only viable rich
client strategy for .NET, and C# will forever and always be the only
viable language for .NET. That is a position which you have never been
able to satifactorily defend.
Randy
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- References:
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Randy Magruder
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Randy Magruder
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: Thinking Clearly
- Prev by Date: Re: Thinking Clearly
- Next by Date: Re: Chronological ordering of methods
- Previous by thread: Re: Thinking Clearly
- Next by thread: Re: Thinking Clearly
- Index(es):