Re: Thinking Clearly

Brian Moelk wrote:

That's right, but it doesn't matter what ECO requires technically,
it's about what is required to obtain ECO.

How much do you suppose ECO is worth by itself? Is it worth having to
pay that added price of the $1000+ to get the IDE too? Would not ECO
by itself be substantially less cost if it were a VS.NET add-in? (Man,
I hate making Peter's arguments for him!)

Randy
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is anybody using ECO?
    ... ECO but whether the payoffs for the effort required to learn and master ... are worth it for somebody starting from scratch with a new project and no ... I was fortunate enough to have found Bold back in about 2001, ... enables to design applications in a way that you didn't think of before, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Is anybody using ECO?
    ... apps with ECO but whether the payoffs for the effort required to ... learn and master ECO are worth it for somebody starting from scratch ... Was it worth it for many programmers ... if it would yield increased productivity later. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Who needs .NET?
    ... > I know mutual agreement seems to go against the spirit of non-tech, ... Well, for what it's worth, I'm agreeing with you too. ... I haven't got started with ECO yet, but it's the one thing that makes me ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: How to beat MSVS with DDS2007 - Hehe
    ... Fluff in a product is something not worth using, ... statement shows your ignorance on the subject. ... Why would you say ECO does not add much value? ... Perhaps your "filler" is my ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Toronto DUG meeting June 6th with John Kaster
    ... it might be worth a look. ... the time to learn ECO and I gotta say, ... The best way to bug Borland about bugs. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)