Re: Turbo questions
- From: "I.P. Nichols" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:56:59 -0400
"Dave Nottage [TeamB]" wrote:
Jolyon Smith wrote:
Indeed. So well that it includes Turbo Delphi for .NET, and Turbo
C#.
Creating a supply of something doesn't create - nor necessarily even
indicate the existence of - any demand for it.
It's certainly a much better indicator (especially considering that
there's multiple tools/deployments for .NET from multiple vendors) than
someone saying it's "irrelevant" without providing any evidence of that
at all.
There is definatly a demand for .NET tools, take a look at this:
http://blogs.msdn.com/danielfe/archive/2006/08/10/694715.aspx
A couple of points that impressed me.
1) They had 6 million downloads in the first 8 months and a survey showed
that 61% were new to .NET.
2) "...dozens of market research summaries that basically showed the pro and
non-pro customers having different needs and showing that a sizeable portion
of these customers pricing behavior was closer to being perfectly elastic
(using made up numbers this would be something like charging as little as $5
for Express could cut Express adoption by half)."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: lurkio
- Re: Turbo questions
- References:
- Turbo questions
- From: Kristofer Skaug
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Ralf Kaiser
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Kristofer Skaug
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Uffe Kousgaard
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Brian Twinings
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Turbo questions
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Turbo questions
- Prev by Date: Re: Turbo questions
- Next by Date: Re: Turbo questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Turbo questions
- Next by thread: Re: Turbo questions
- Index(es):