Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- From: "Brad White" <bwhite at inebraska.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:45:23 -0500
"Jolyon Smith" <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f54f9e891ccdb92989907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Seems the Turbo line misses the point in two key areas:
Joylon,
You are doing a great job of explaining what you don't like
about the chosen set of limitations.
What I haven't heard is what set of limitations you *would*
be happy with.
Knowing that you've thought this all through, I'm looking
forward to hearing your ideas.
--
Thanks,
Brad.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- References:
- Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why should I upgrade?
- Next by Date: Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- Next by thread: Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- Index(es):