Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- From: "Dan Smith" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Aug 2006 05:59:46 -0700
"Clinton R. Johnson" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oddly, it appears that BDS uses seperate
licenses for each language. Not sure why they don't just sell us per
language licensing instead of increasing the complexity of the product
by creating 4 new SKUs.
Someone says "why doesn't Borland offer them as separate products". The next says "why make it more complex by offering them as separate products".
Time to defer to that guy that was offering advice around 2000 years ago.
--
Dan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- From: Clinton R. Johnson
- Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- References:
- Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- From: Clinton R. Johnson
- Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- Prev by Date: Re: C++Builder e BDE: help me!
- Next by Date: Re: How much is Delphi really worth to you?
- Previous by thread: Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- Next by thread: Re: Turbo: A great idea, not properly thought through... ?
- Index(es):