Re: Upgrade path to Turbo Delphi

Brian Twinings wrote:


We already know that, and we have also noticed that DevCo isn't any
different from Borland.

I know you all do -- asI clearly stated, I'm just posting for the
benefit of folks who might be confused on the point.

--
Nick Hodges
Delphi/C# Product Manager - Borland DTG
http://blogs.borland.com/nickhodges
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ruby on rails
    ... I'm describing a strategy to keep the IDE business profitable. ... So it is about DevCo, not Borland. ... I'm not a soldier in the holy war of Delphi. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: New Company - new ideas ?
    ... Borland was packed with new ideas and milked Delphi W32 ... If DevCo would do the same, ... I'm talking about functional languages that are getting more and more ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • John Kaster in Milwaukee
    ... Tonight JK gave a D2006 presentation, and as usual he did a superb job. ... A few of us asked questions about the DevCo sale. ... case no investors offer what Borland thinks DevCo is worth, ... mix C++ and Delphi code in the same project and have Delphi take care of all ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: A voice from the community
    ... I think the best way for DevCo is not to use a thirty part framework ... but it's framework (VCL) with ALMOST the same caracteristic. ... (like the old borland way) ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: A voice from the community
    ... I think the best way for DevCo is not to use a thirty part framework ... but it's framework (VCL) with ALMOST the same caracteristic. ... (like the old borland way) ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)