Re: Win32 Needs
- From: Tony Bryer <tonyb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:42:34 +0100
In article <44f72846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Moelk wrote:
Hence the problem with buying one or the other. ;) Long live the BDE...
When I was a teenager I used to read the Readers Digest (but I didn't
inhale <g>). The condensed book one month was Confessions of a Lion Tamer,
and the one bit of wisdom from it that remains was that if you approach
the lion your are taming holding a chair by its back the lion looks at the
four legs and can't decide which one to attack so is in your power. [Do
not test this claim on a real lion <g>]
I feel the same wrt BDE: we keep our records (3,000 users, 50,000 'disk'
ships) on dBASE tables accessed via BDE and Delphi front ends. I know I
should be moving on but when I type BDE alternatives into Google and read
the conflicting claims I get transfixed like the lion.
A key advantage to us of sticking with DBFs is being able to mail-merge
from them.
--
Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk
Shareware Industry Conference 2006 sponsor www.sic.org
.
- References:
- Win32 Needs
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DTG)
- Re: Win32 Needs
- From: Alexander Tereshchenko
- Re: Win32 Needs
- From: Dennis Landi
- Re: Win32 Needs
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DTG)
- Re: Win32 Needs
- From: Dennis Landi
- Re: Win32 Needs
- From: J. Lee
- Re: Win32 Needs
- From: Brian Moelk
- Win32 Needs
- Prev by Date: Re: New help system
- Next by Date: Re: New help system
- Previous by thread: Re: Win32 Needs
- Next by thread: Re: Win32 Needs
- Index(es):