Re: .NET anger.
- From: Jolyon Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:47:42 +1200
In article <44ffd00d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joanna Carter [TeamB]
says...
"Pete Goodwin" <goodwin.REMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message
de news: 44ffb0eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Maybe I should do some benchmarks for myself to see which is faster:
| pure WIN32 or .NET.
I would say that generics has to be a major factor in
speed increase in the many apps as it removes the need for casting and
boxing.
Boxing maybe, but surely casting has 0 overhead? It's compiler sugar,
not runtime tricks (with the exception of "magic" casts like String
(PChar), but these aren't generally anything to do with generics)
And comparing 2.0 and 1.1 muddies things as you are also involving two
different runtimes. aiui For some reason, even though .net was just as
fast as native code, the .net 2.0 runtime benefited from some
performance improvement work......
;)
--
Jolyon Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: .NET anger.
- From: Joanna Carter [TeamB]
- Re: .NET anger.
- From: Jon Shemitz
- Re: .NET anger.
- References:
- .NET anger.
- From: Rich
- Re: .NET anger.
- From: mr_organic
- Re: .NET anger.
- From: Thomas Mueller
- Re: .NET anger.
- From: Brandon Staggs
- Re: .NET anger.
- From: Petr Vones
- Re: .NET anger.
- From: Pete Goodwin
- Re: .NET anger.
- From: Joanna Carter [TeamB]
- .NET anger.
- Prev by Date: Re: The real Turbo Delphi
- Next by Date: Re: .Net FURY!!
- Previous by thread: Re: .NET anger.
- Next by thread: Re: .NET anger.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading