Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: "John Kaster (Borland/DevCo)" <johnk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Sep 2006 17:22:55 -0700
Dean Hill wrote:
Why would that be the case?
Because an alternate configuration also requires a full certification.
--
John Kaster http://blogs.borland.com/johnk
Features and bugs: http://qc.borland.com
Get source: http://cc.borland.com
If it's not here, it's not happening: http://ec.borland.com
.
- References:
- Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: Yu Haibo
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: Dave White
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: John Kaster (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: John Kaster (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: Rich
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: John Kaster (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: Dean Hill
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: John Kaster (Borland/DevCo)
- Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- From: Dean Hill
- Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- Prev by Date: Re: Danny Thorpe video interview
- Next by Date: Turbo Delphi art - part I
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|