Discussion: "Why Visual Studion 2005 is better then BDS 2006?"

I was told on several occasions that "Visual Studio 2005 is better then BDS
2006 as of now".

To go behind a front of the statement we need to figure out what exactly
makes VS2005 better then BDS2006.

This thread is not for bashing, so please stay away from that. Rather,
please say what you think about "better, because...".

Excluded items for discussion:

* bugs (known subject"

* MS (known subject"




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Discussion: "Why Visual Studion 2005 is better then BDS 2006?"
    ... tweaks, Borland compilers included), and Visual C++ has mounumentally ... Visual Studio gives you C++/CLI options that BDS does ... language, though, respectively. ... Visual Studio has a better help system (better organized, at least, same ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Improve BSD Help yourself
    ... It requires the installation ... far it's really nice to have an Delphi branch in the Visual Studio help ... if CodeGear could provide the required tools together with BDS, ... You mean borland has found a way for us to correct their mistakes? ...
    (comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc)
  • Re: Microsoft Release VS2003 SP1
    ... Visual Studio DVD to apply the patch. ... others have had issues running Visual Studio after the patch. ... And, frankly, kudos for Borland for not having the problems to fix in BDS ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Discussion: "Why Visual Studion 2005 is better then BDS 2006?"
    ... In terms of Windows class libraries, I'd say VCL is better than ... anything I've seen in Visual Studio land. ... Not restricted to .NET 1.1 as BDS is now. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: BDS C# and Framework version
    ... Btw, I have recently tried Visual Studio 2005 on my Windows 2003 server at home. ... BDS 2006 has been working like a charm on the same computer. ... Since I am only trying to learn .NET in my personal time, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)