Re: Strange behaviour in BDS2006
- From: "Clinton R. Johnson" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2006 16:47:04 -0700
Nick Hodges (Borland/DTG) wrote:
Larry Maturo wrote:
Any ideas?
Ignore the erroneous reports is the best I can offer you now.
Ya, the bogus errors before the first compile are pretty annoying... As
many of the units being included are only available in DCU format, I've
wondered if it wasn't possible to just use them anyways, but then I
realize that the uncompiled units listed could contain overrides that
aren't compiled.
I've wondered if a lighter weight parse wouldn't help things like this,
something that doesn't have to do ALL the heavy lifting involved in
real compilation. Quick & dirty parsing of interface sections mayhaps.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Strange behaviour in BDS2006
- From: Nick Hodges (Borland/DTG)
- Re: Strange behaviour in BDS2006
- Prev by Date: Re: Download avaible in this year?
- Next by Date: Re: DevCo News This Month ??
- Previous by thread: Re: SA License due for renewal
- Next by thread: Re: Strange behaviour in BDS2006
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|