Re: Features versus Capability

From: "Dave Nottage [TeamB]" <rot13.qnivqa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 5 Oct 2006 17:18:59 -0700

Mat Ballard wrote:

..a Capability that many people do not want and will not pay for.

I really don't understand this line. Are you saying that Borland should
have left it out, and if so, what about the many people that do want it
and are willing to pay?

--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Features versus Capability
  - From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: Features versus Capability
  - From: Lucian

References:
- Features versus Capability
  - From: Mat Ballard

Prev by Date: Re: Turbo Delphi made with???
Next by Date: Re: Turbo Delphi made with???
Previous by thread: Re: Features versus Capability
Next by thread: Re: Features versus Capability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: [Delphi 64-bit] Observation for the day
... They are also saying that 64bit processors won't be ... > - that Borland will not do it if Borland think they'd lose money on ... Wrong and please someone kick him off TeamB. ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
Re: Is anything spectacular going to happen around Delphi anymore?
... >> are extremely loyal to Borland, such as Rudy V. of TeamB, are saying ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
Re: Can anyone reproduce this?
... John Kaster (Borland) wrote: ... > Are you saying you reproduced it? ... Dave Nottage [TeamB] ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
Re: Is anything spectacular going to happen around Delphi anymore?
... > are extremely loyal to Borland, such as Rudy V. of TeamB, are saying ... Borland is doomed, Delphi is doomed, the competituion is too big, etc. ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
Re: F2084 internal error: DBG1695
... :)) and they most likely could care less about a deprecated version ... comes to Borland products so I wouldn't even be surprised if Borland ... Im not saying whos fault, Im just saying that if its a fault in Dev ...
(borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)