Re: The best possible direction for Delphi?
- From: " Tom Corey" <omtay.oreycay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Oct 2006 14:22:52 -0700
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] wrote:
Sure, it could have been built in that time [...]
Really? It took Microsoft more time and two tries to get it right.
Notwithstanding the opportunity cost you reference.
I was accepting Kostya's claim for the sake of discussion. Change
"could" to "might". The point wasn't how long it would take so much as
the fact that with finite resources and time, it's impossible to do the
infinite things some people seem to be insisting on.
.
- References:
- The best possible direction for Delphi?
- From: Charles Vinal
- Re: The best possible direction for Delphi?
- From: Kostya
- Re: The best possible direction for Delphi?
- From: John Kaster (Borland/DTG)
- Re: The best possible direction for Delphi?
- From: Kostya
- Re: The best possible direction for Delphi?
- From: Tom Corey
- Re: The best possible direction for Delphi?
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- The best possible direction for Delphi?
- Prev by Date: Re: Wild speculations about the "other" factors
- Next by Date: Re: beautiful delphi
- Previous by thread: Re: The best possible direction for Delphi?
- Next by thread: Re: The best possible direction for Delphi?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|