Re: Borland/DevCO has lost its innovative power
- From: "Nathaniel L. Walker" <NatLWalker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:31:46 -0600
I totally agree, I think the functionality provided by the IDE is awesome,
and I always hated the multiple floating windows in the old IDEs. I was
just saying that Lazarus does (IMO) function equivalent to a 1.0 version
software. There are many Open Source software packages ready for
production that aren't at version 1.0.
- Nate.
"Markus Humm" <markus.humm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45446ade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Nathaniel L. Walker schrieb:
One can argue that BDS2006 wasn't a full version upgrade as well,
with its many bugs and incomplete C++ development environment
upon release. I think open source software has a much different
versioning scheme than most closed source solutions, since they aren't
managed and maintained in much the same way (outside of commercial
variants of open source software).
Hm, partily agree. If you have used D2005 BDS2006 is a big improvement,
starts up faster and crashes substancially less.
And they've integrated C++ where some update was missing for years. They
provided the needed stability update of is as promissed within 2 months
(that is before the end of 2005). BDS2006 was mostly useable from start
where D2005 utterly needed the service pack 1 at least...
Greetings
Markus
.
- References:
- Re: Borland/DevCO has lost its innovative power
- From: Kevin B
- Re: Borland/DevCO has lost its innovative power
- From: Nathaniel L. Walker
- Re: Borland/DevCO has lost its innovative power
- From: Markus Humm
- Re: Borland/DevCO has lost its innovative power
- Prev by Date: Re: Coding Horrors, Cargo Cult Programming, and other Ghoulish Things
- Next by Date: Re: Borland/DevCO has lost its innovative power
- Previous by thread: Re: Borland/DevCO has lost its innovative power
- Next by thread: Re: Borland/DevCO has lost its innovative power
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|