Re: Bigger isn't always better
- From: "Henrick Hellström [StreamSec]" <henrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:39:00 +0100
Nathaniel L. Walker wrote:
It doesn't matter if it shined in your opinion or in the opinion of the author
of the article, or not. It's working for them, very well in fact.
Huh? It is very clear that Vista is only a subset of what was planned for Longhorn, it took five years from the release of XP and the deadline was postponed a number of times. I don't think it is unfair to say *something* went wrong along the way.
I think wiith the new modeling features in Visual Studio 2005 it was quite
important to include Together Support in BDS2006. Also, IIRC ECO
needs modeling functionality to work.
That's a completely different question. I don't know if it ever was an option, but Modelmaker was bundled with Delphi 7, and in retrospect one might ask if that would have been a better alternative, than to port Together from Java to J# and spend five releases of the BDS IDE to solve all issues with that integration. Don't ask me.
--
Henrick Hellström
www.streamsec.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bigger isn't always better
- From: Nathaniel L. Walker
- Re: Bigger isn't always better
- From: Q Correll
- Re: Bigger isn't always better
- References:
- Bigger isn't always better
- From: "Henrick Hellström [StreamSec]"
- Re: Bigger isn't always better
- From: Nathaniel L. Walker
- Re: Bigger isn't always better
- From: Maël Hörz
- Re: Bigger isn't always better
- From: Nathaniel L. Walker
- Re: Bigger isn't always better
- From: "Henrick Hellström [StreamSec]"
- Re: Bigger isn't always better
- From: Nathaniel L. Walker
- Bigger isn't always better
- Prev by Date: Re: Is D7 "abandonware"?
- Next by Date: Re: Late majority
- Previous by thread: Re: Bigger isn't always better
- Next by thread: Re: Bigger isn't always better
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
