Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: Eric Grange <egrangeNO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:10:13 +0100
So you didn't find his turn-about amusing?
Not at all.
For all I know of this blog and its plastered agenda, it could well have been something planned from the beginning. Fake turn-abouts are a good old hyping classic.
And who would be these trustable review sites,> do you count yourself as one
Nope, last time I checked, I wasn't maintaining a review site, nor a even blog for that matter ^_^
> since I seem to recall you as a developer having often ranted
> about .NET and Vista's poor performance and let's face it we
> all have an agenda. :)
Of course. But there is IMO a step between argumenting in a newsgroup, which is IMO a bit like argumenting around a beer, ie. informal and staged for fast obsolescence and irrelevance, and establishing a website/blog in your name to somehow officialize a crusade there. :)
Eric
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: I.P. Nichols
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- References:
- The Future might be Flex 2
- From: Jon Burnham
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: Shawn B.
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: I.P. Nichols
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: I.P. Nichols
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- From: I.P. Nichols
- The Future might be Flex 2
- Prev by Date: Re: Is D7 "abandonware"?
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi 2007 (HighLander) - Public Beta?
- Previous by thread: Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- Next by thread: Re: The Future might be Flex 2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|