Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Brian Moelk <bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:37:37 -0500
frank wrote:
Other approach could be:
the combination YUI-Ext + MagicAjax + Asp.Net ECO App + nBackEnd? to this
combination was perfect only need that work Asp.Net ECO App on Mono
IMO, MagicAjax really isn't required here as YUI already provides
library support for AJAX stuff. I don't know anything about MagicAjax,
but it looks like it's a Pre-Atlas type solution for ASP.NET.
Regardless, the use of YUI + YUI-Ext can be done more naturally with
Rails than Intraweb or ASP.NET. I believe this is exactly the kind of
thing that works better with Rails than Intraweb or ASP.NET.
Intraweb and ASP.NET's non-javascript (or javascript +
server-side/designer) component architecture is its strength and
weakness in this regard. The strength is that you get tools to help you
build your UI and insulation from HTML/JavaScript by leveraging
components. The weakness is that it insulates you from HTML/JavaScript,
it's harder not to leverage components and harder to integrate
javascript libraries that utilize simple http gets and posts.
Disclaimer: I'm not saying that Intraweb and ASP.NET are alike other
beyond providing designers and having a strong component model. There
are other differences between the two frameworks.
--
Brian Moelk
Brain Endeavor LLC
bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: frank
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- References:
- RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Sandeep Chandra
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: John Kaster (CodeGear)
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: frank
- RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- Prev by Date: Re: Bye bye CF.Net for Delphi dev?
- Next by Date: Re: Reporting components for CDS 2007?
- Previous by thread: Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- Next by thread: Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- Index(es):