Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb



I don´t know why but I have the impression that using html + javascript like
yui it work
more faster that using the component architecture like intraweb or asp.net,
I don´t know if the browse do better cache to .js or css, but to me I get
more quickly an
page using the first approach.

some one can tell if I am right and why?

kind regards
Frank

"Brian Moelk" <bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió en el mensaje
news:45820a33$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
frank wrote:
Other approach could be:

the combination YUI-Ext + MagicAjax + Asp.Net ECO App + nBackEnd? to this
combination was perfect only need that work Asp.Net ECO App on Mono

IMO, MagicAjax really isn't required here as YUI already provides
library support for AJAX stuff. I don't know anything about MagicAjax,
but it looks like it's a Pre-Atlas type solution for ASP.NET.

Regardless, the use of YUI + YUI-Ext can be done more naturally with
Rails than Intraweb or ASP.NET. I believe this is exactly the kind of
thing that works better with Rails than Intraweb or ASP.NET.

Intraweb and ASP.NET's non-javascript (or javascript +
server-side/designer) component architecture is its strength and
weakness in this regard. The strength is that you get tools to help you
build your UI and insulation from HTML/JavaScript by leveraging
components. The weakness is that it insulates you from HTML/JavaScript,
it's harder not to leverage components and harder to integrate
javascript libraries that utilize simple http gets and posts.

Disclaimer: I'm not saying that Intraweb and ASP.NET are alike other
beyond providing designers and having a strong component model. There
are other differences between the two frameworks.

--
Brian Moelk
Brain Endeavor LLC
bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
    ... MagicAjax really isn't required here as YUI already provides ... library support for AJAX stuff. ... I don't know anything about MagicAjax, ... thing that works better with Rails than Intraweb or ASP.NET. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: betfair.com like site
    ... Take any IntraWeb 4.0 demo - ANY one and ... > see you try that without Javascript. ... Uwe ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)
  • Re: IWCS Location ?
    ... be able to use full client side Javascript, yet IW is not letting me. ... IWCS has been discontinued, but IntraWeb of course supports client ... JavaScript on Form and control level. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)