Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: "Relaxin" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:11:08 -0800
"Lars Fosdal" <Lars(q)Fosdal.com> wrote in message
news:fvv8o29adt9a7hcimah74t6tvqlb4j1qo5@xxxxxxxxxx
This is really cool stuff, but it still seem to have some seriousI don't know much about that as we host our own servers our host them at the
disadvantages, especially if it was to be running on rented space, ie
how most small companies and individuals probably host web sites
today.
It requires access to running executables on your server. Most hosted
services don't like that - and you have to pay a premium price to be
allowed to do so.
client site.
It is unclear how this will lend itself to multiple concurrentIf by "multiple concurrent contributors" you mean multiple people working on
contributors, as everything gets compiled into a monolithic
distribution.
...but it is cool as heck :)
the same project, then Morfik has the option of all of the source can be
created as individual files so that a Version Control system can be used.
Otherwise all of the source can be stored in 1 project file, all nicely
packed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Lars Fosdal
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- References:
- RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Sandeep Chandra
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: John Kaster (CodeGear)
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: frank
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Relaxin
- Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- From: Lars Fosdal
- RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- Prev by Date: Re: FINALLY! CodeGear.com is up!!!
- Next by Date: Re: FINALLY! CodeGear.com is up!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- Next by thread: Re: RubyOnRails and Intraweb
- Index(es):