Re: BDS 2006

"B. Eschrich" <bjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:458c051d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

however, the source code was ported to BDS 2005, now it should compiled
with BDS 2006. Some changes needed, ok, and i want to fix it but the IDE
let me not - the hungs - hmm ?!


Yes - but did you delete the *.dsk files and *.bdsproj files etc. left over
from BDS2005? They are the sort of files I'm suspecting are contributing to
the problems.

Alternatively, after the bad stability experiences with D2005, I still
disable the 'Known IDE' packages in the Registry that I have no interest in
(e.g. Together, Start page, History, ToDo list, Caliber etc.) and also turn
off the bells and whistles in BDS 2006 > Tools > Optionsthat just get in my
way (e.g. the Code Insight features - especially Error Insight). Maybe this
is why I no longer have IDE glitches?

--
Chris Burrows
CFB Software
http://www.cfbsoftware.com/gpcp


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Native Delphi IDE
    ... I think their current strategy to have an IDE which hosts both Win32 ... comparison to what us Delphi developers are used to, ... And of course, BDS ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: You finally beat me down
    ... I had a perfectly great BCB6 setup but I figured i'd support CodeGear and buy BDS 2006. ... I didn't have any immediate need to move to BDS but I was coaxed by the ide enhancements, Rave bundle, Debugger improvements, and XP theme support. ... It's having to migrate all of these 3rd party controls to the next version of the ide that keep people from upgrading. ... If I have a large native app to build, it will be in WTL/wxWidgets or QT. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: You finally beat me down
    ... expect the IDE to 'solve' that. ... BDS 2006 C++ personality. ... ask your component vendor to make support for it. ... flagship *native* compiler cross compile to linux, Windows CE, mac. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Delphi in the enterprise
    ... Currently their view, as was stated to us by Boz, is that most of the larger customers are going to buy VS no matter what and so Borland will sell the rest of the package to them. ... As we all know, once developers get attached to a certain IDE, it's almost impossible to pry it away from them. ... If I were a salesperson the last thing I would do is try to push BDS in favor of VS.NET, when CoreSDP for .NET can be positioned as an upsell for VS.NET. ... response to a market trend where they see larger enterprises no longer buying development tools by themselves - IDEs are a *necessary but insufficient* component and are beginning to be taken for granted, and thus they are something that is included with the larger package of tools rather than independently marketed. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Great SWT Program
    ... fact that source code is plain text, ... They can obscure knowledge, just like use of Struts can obscure knowledge of the Model-View-Controller paradigm, or use of java.io can obscure knowledge of low-level file I/O. ... The nightly build-and-test cycle should not rely on an IDE, but occur via Ant, a good version-control system and command-line tools like javac. ... They also introduce dependencies on their internal build tools, which is why it takes some work to build a project via Ant once you've locked yourself into the IDE's way of doing things. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)