Re: Is there any hope for Microsoft ?

Brian Moelk wrote:
Rod wrote:
Have a look at the .net history and its predecessors:

API ->lives
DDE ->dead
COM ->dead
OLE ->dead
OCX ->dead
ActiveX ->dead
DCOM ->dead
COM+ ->dead
..Net -> ??? ;-))))

Any predictions?

IMO, COM and all it's variants (ActiveX, DCOM, COM+) are not "dead".

But they should be.

David S.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MS Certificate Services
    ... in case) which resolved the ActiveX issue but now ... the "Generating Request" display hangs and generates an ... >David B. Cross ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: Rogers been very, very lucky
    ... David W wrote: ... May we assume you've not picked Federer to win this Wimbledon, ... Of course, to be logically consistent, you couldn't have, since you've ... he started a thread asking for predictions. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: Captain Jakes Top Ten List of what Id like to see inthenextversionof Delphi
    ... Do you buy ActiveX versions of your controls? ... to me that those products would suit you better. ... Brian Moelk ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Looking for good quality Glyphs and Images
    ... I believe David Ridgway's new venture is: http://www.clevericons.com/ ... Brian Moelk ... Brain Endeavor LLC ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)
  • How to transfer from javascript to c#
    ... I add a ActiveX in my asp.net and I can get it's return and put it in ... my TextBox. ... David. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)