Re: BDS 2007 ETA? - Software Assurance gets a no vote here

Bob Dawson wrote:
While that holds validity - it still does not give any merit to the
argument that "Well if MS does it, then CG can too"

I never made such an argument. CodeGear is certainly in no position
to act as MS does, and I'd hope they wouldn't even if they could.

Im not sure if it was you or not, but every time its brought up one or
more replies pop up "Well what about MS, they do x". My point was if MS
does x or not, it has no bearing on CG's performance.

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasi
c&articleId=9007527

I'm sure there is all kinds of dirt on MS. Its a big company and anyone
who does anything is put in the press. But even if they do it as a
whole, again it doesnt bear on the conversation here. Im not defending
nor attacking MS in this or other issues in this thread. The sole issue
here is CG and Delphi.

--
Chad Z. Hower
Microsoft Regional Director
"Programming is an art form that fights back"
http://www.KudzuWorld.com/
Need a professional technical speaker at your event?
http://www.woo-hoo.net
.

Relevant Pages