Re: WAMP will beat LAMP pretty soon!


"Gbenga Abimbola" <gabimbola@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, I know, people have been developing application under
Windows and deploying it to *nix servers. Perhaps I should
have written: "Total cost of ownership on WAMP will be
cheaper than Total cost of ownership on LAMP."

Why do you think everybody uses LAMP instead of WAMP? TCO perhaps?

Daniël Mantione
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: WAMP will beat LAMP pretty soon!
    ... Windows and deploying it to *nix servers. ... cheaper than Total cost of ownership on LAMP." ... What does WAMP have to do with .NET anyway? ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: WAMP will beat LAMP pretty soon!
    ... cheaper than Total cost of ownership on LAMP." ... What's happened recently that would change tco of WAMP or LAMP or of WAMP as ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: WAMP will beat LAMP pretty soon!
    ... cheaper than Total cost of ownership on LAMP." ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: TCO - Windows vs Linux
    ... >} "Microsoft has long asked third party analysts for accurate assessments ... >} of the total cost of ownership of Microsoft Windows deployments, ... spell ownership with 0. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Ping Elder
    ... Auto, though, which is the issue. ... ownership. ... Diesel Passats are hugely in demand. ... Again, think total cost of ...
    (uk.rec.cars.modifications)