Re: Yet another reason for openTools API attention

Brian Moelk wrote:
Sergio Sette wrote:
I think the OTA community is smaller than expected. The main reason because not so many people are interested in OTA is the lack of documentation and of course the absence of the (right) focus on it.


There are times when all of the TLAs that we use drive me nuts.

One of my hobbies is astronomy, and I am on several astronomy newsgroups. In the vernacular of astronomers, OTA means "Optical Tube Assembly", and I see it far more often there than I do here. So, my brain kind of came to a skidding stop as I'm going through all the Delphi messages and hit 'OTA'... <G>

David Erbas-White
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Yet another reason for openTools API attention
    ... Sergio Sette wrote: ... course the absence of the focus on it. ... the OTA community doesn't have to be that big (relative to ... without the basic documentation is at least very improductive. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Diamondback new features for Win32
    ... > don't see signs of this improving much for Diamondback, ... at least now there *is* OTA documentation. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Any Smalltalk ethusiasts out there?
    ... OpenTools API and provide the kind of documentation and high>level of IDE ... I commented about OTA a few days, ago with the same subject, strangenly, not much people seem it interested... ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)