Re: Native Delphi
- From: "Mark Reichert" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:50:07 -0500
"Lord Crc" <lordcrc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:t6mav2tdk3inmf1sfrabol1gler41ob***@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:16:31 -0500, "Mark Reichert"
<mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Any improvements over VB which also was interpretted by a runtime module?
The .NET runtime never runs the code by interpreting it, it's always
compiled into native code (JIT) before execution. This was a design
decision, and the IL (byte code) was designed with this in mind,
unlike say Java.
I read about that in a later post in this thread. It wasn't clear from Mr.
Lebeau's post that the runtime interpretation was only done the first time.
I really should know more about this, but there hasn't been a need yet.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Native Delphi
- From: Lord Crc
- Re: Native Delphi
- References:
- Native Delphi
- From: M. Materanni
- Re: Native Delphi
- From: Remy Lebeau \(TeamB\)
- Re: Native Delphi
- From: Mark Reichert
- Re: Native Delphi
- From: Lord Crc
- Native Delphi
- Prev by Date: Re: Delphi 2007 loses W95/98 support?
- Next by Date: Re: Outrageous UK Prices for Delphi 2007-Win32
- Previous by thread: Re: Native Delphi
- Next by thread: Re: Native Delphi
- Index(es):