Re: So, how's D2007?
- From: Jolyon Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:08:43 +1200
In article <45ff2a8a$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bob Dawson says...
"Jolyon Smith" wrote
SA has no such redeeming qualities. It is a gamble pure and simple.
No, it's a long term strategy to make my purchases from CodeGear predictable
from a budgetting perspective, and cheaper over the long term. Both of which
it easily acomplishes.
You simply do not and cannot know that it will achieve those things.
What's that? You don't know what software I'm going to release or if
it's going to be of any interest to you?
Pssst - same goes for CodeGear SA, and my SA deal is cheaper!
No, actually, the same doesn't go for CodeGear at all. I make a living in
software development, primarily using CodeGear tools. When you have a track
record of providing tools that put food on my table more effectively than
anything else I could buy, I'll surely take you up on your offer.
Why? You're not buying a track record, you're buying future software
updates, from a company currently unwilling or unable to give any clear
indication of what future software products they will be offering let
alone actually delivering or when.
But let's accept for sake of argument that you are buying a track
record? Whose track record? CodeGear have no history apart from that
which they inherit from Borland.
D4, D6, D8, BDS 2005 ...
A more recent track record? How about selling a product at one target
group then retrospectively and unilaterally redefining that target group
to exclude people that the product was specifically marketted at.
Are these the things you hold up as justifying belief in their track
record?
it's no gamble whatsoever
to think I'll still want to be using it next year.
It's a gamble to expect that the version you will be using next year
will not be the one you are using now.
The only question people considering SA need to ask themselves is whether
they see themselves continuing to use Delphi in the next 3+ years.
No, that's not the question at all. The question is whether they will
blindly and without question upgrade to every new version that comes
along as soon as it is released.
If the answer to that question is "Yes" then SA makes sense. No
argument.
But if the answer is "No, I'll look at each release and decide whether
it's worth while for me at that time or some future point to upgrade"
then SA -might- be worth while, but it might not.
What is
does have to do with is a sense of professional identity
Is it an economic argument or an emotional one?
You can't have it both ways.
--
Jolyon Smith
WHILE INKEY$ WEND
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: So, how's D2007?
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: So, how's D2007?
- References:
- So, how's D2007?
- From: Paul Dolen
- Re: So, how's D2007?
- From: Q Correll
- Re: So, how's D2007?
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: So, how's D2007?
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: So, how's D2007?
- From: Jolyon Smith
- Re: So, how's D2007?
- From: Bob Dawson
- So, how's D2007?
- Prev by Date: Re: Sorry, but not happy with D2007
- Next by Date: Re: Sorry, but not happy with D2007
- Previous by thread: Re: So, how's D2007?
- Next by thread: Re: So, how's D2007?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|