Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: DerekUK <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2007 05:02:05 -0700
On Apr 30, 8:23 am, "Dave Nottage [TeamB]" <dav...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Richard Grossman wrote:
You see anyone from legal, marketing, investor relations, or the
outside auditors rushing in here to clarify anything?
They obviously realise their time is better spent finding a solution,
than arguing that the problem exists.
--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
Well they seem to have been trying to find a solution to this for the
last 4 Months at least. Plus as Richard has pointed out here and on
other threads the reason seems to Keep morphing from one thing to
another as time goes on and people query things. With how long this
has been going on and other things that have been happening more
generally some people are bound to start getting Skeptical.
.
- References:
- Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Richard Grossman
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: John Jacobson
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Brad White
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Richard Grossman
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Nick Hodges (CodeGear)
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Richard Grossman
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Richard Grossman
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Rob Al
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Richard Grossman
- Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Sarbanes-Oxley again
- Prev by Date: Re: BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- Next by Date: Re: Avoiding floating points
- Previous by thread: Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- Next by thread: Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|