Re: BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- From: DerekUK <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2007 06:41:00 -0700
On Apr 30, 2:17 pm, Rob Al <r...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard Grossman wrote:
Can't tell you - it would help the competition, oops, correct that to:
Can't tell you - have to clear it through marketing, oops, correct that to:
Can't tell you - have to clear it through legal, oops, correct that to:
Can't tell you - it would violate Sarbanes-Oxley, oops, correct that to:
Can't tell you - it would violate accounting rules regarding revenue
recognition, oops, correct that to:
Can't tell you - the outside auditors say we can't.
It might all be true.
After all, the world changes and the reasons for Borland/Codegears
non-communication probably have changed too.
It might all be true. Problem is each time the reason changes it seems
rightly or wrongly to be when a number of people raise plausible
questions as to the validity of the previous reason given.
.
- References:
- BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- From: Jason Fischer
- Re: BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- From: Richard Grossman
- Re: BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- From: Rob Al
- BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- Prev by Date: Re: Sarbanes-Oxley again
- Next by Date: Re: BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- Previous by thread: Re: BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- Next by thread: Re: BDS 2007 - What is the Est release date?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
