Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- From: "Frank J" <jamesFr@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:27:49 -0700
"Paul Nichols [TeamB]" <paul@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4661b6ad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The only time a VM is necessary, is when you are writing to different OS and hardware, IMHO. I certainly do not see why a VM is necessary for a single hardware platform and OS. To me, this makes no sense whatsoever.We use VM to test against different version and flavors of Windows.
Vista Ultimate, Vista Business, XP Pro, XP Home, Win 2000, Win ME, the Server flavors, etc.
So I disagree, VM's are handy even on the same hardware and OS.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- From: Paul Nichols [TeamB]
- Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- From: m. Th.
- Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- References:
- What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- From: Esteban Pacheco
- Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- From: Paul Nichols [TeamB]
- Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- From: m. Th.
- Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- From: Paul Nichols [TeamB]
- What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- Prev by Date: Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- Next by Date: Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- Previous by thread: Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- Next by thread: Re: What will many cores mean to future Windows releases?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|