Re: Screen size
- From: "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jul 2007 13:35:40 -0700
Steve Tyrakowski wrote:
In article <xn0f9d8hk1xmtjw00vrvelthuis@xxxxxxxxx>, Rudy Velthuis
[TeamB] wrote:
Otherwise I'd assume that people have at least 800x600. Nowadays,
people probably all have 1024x768.
Just cuz they have 1024x768 available doesn't mean that they won't
cry about it being too small to read and switch to 800x600 or 640x480.
In our case, they also provide the hardware, to be sure we have a
proper setup. <g>
Anyway, if the user switches to a lower resolution, the program won't
work. <g>
Like I said, there is a difference. Uf your program is one of many used
on a computer, you abide by the rules. If your program is (virtually)
the only one run, it can set some of the rules. <g>
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.de
"When you hear hoofbeats, think of horses, not zebras."
-- Old saying
.
- References:
- Screen size
- From: David Erbas-White
- Re: Screen size
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Screen size
- From: Steve Tyrakowski
- Screen size
- Prev by Date: Re: Screen size
- Next by Date: Re: Extremely long build times
- Previous by thread: Re: Screen size
- Next by thread: Re: Screen size
- Index(es):