Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Brian Moelk <bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:59:33 -0400
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] wrote:
"Native code," to me, means "compiles to x86 instructions." (What else
would it mean, really?)
AFAIK, .NET does this when it runs an application. Does that mean it's
native code?
IMO, it means compiled and executed without a VM. Many Delphi
developers would also exclude a GC in that definition, that was my point
in asking.
I'm talking about how a
huge amount of the C# code I've encountered in the wild relies heavily
on the collection of intermediate instances created inline. And, as I
said, the fact that you really can't do LINQ any other way.
Certainly a good deal of C# code relies on it.
I guess I'm not sure what C# producing "native code" would really mean:
compiled to x86, no VM, but with a GC?
--
Brian Moelk
Brain Endeavor LLC
bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Robert Giesecke
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- References:
- CodeGear wish list
- From: Bruce McGee
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Bernaert Dominique
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Bernaert Dominique
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: CodeGear wish list
- From: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]
- CodeGear wish list
- Prev by Date: Re: CodeGear RAD Studio 2007 - lower prices over past 5 years
- Next by Date: Re: naming products again
- Previous by thread: Re: CodeGear wish list
- Next by thread: Re: CodeGear wish list
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|