Re: New home required
- From: Marco van de Voort <marcov@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Nov 2007 11:45:05 -0700
On 2007-11-06, Peter Morris <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My reason for using the Mozilla license was that I wanted people to be able
to use my source free of charge, but did not want to impose my free choice
on users of my source. For example, I am happy for people to write
commercial applications using my components, and I don't mind them modifying
the source + writing their own versions etc.
Which was never under discussion. The point is that MPL-without-GPL-clause
excludes GPL users (or in this case, people stuck with it).
commercial applications that use my DIB controls for example, one of which
is available in my local PC World store. I'd rather see part of my work in
my local shop than have it avoided because of fears that it might mean
either
Then I honestly wonder why this polite request seems to trouble you so much.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New home required
- From: Peter Morris
- Problem with MPL
- From: none
- Re: New home required
- References:
- New home required
- From: Peter Morris
- Re: New home required
- From: Marco van de Voort
- Re: New home required
- From: Peter Morris
- Re: New home required
- From: Thomas Miller
- Re: New home required
- From: Peter Morris
- New home required
- Prev by Date: Re: help again
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft fires chief information executive
- Previous by thread: Re: New home required
- Next by thread: Problem with MPL
- Index(es):