Re: Problem with MPL
- From: Marco van de Voort <marcov@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Nov 2007 13:03:31 -0700
On 2007-11-08, none <""> wrote:
"The Free Software Foundation (FSF) considers the license a free
software license, but "not a strong copyleft" one. However, "unlike the
X11 license" the license has "some complex restrictions" making it
incompatible with the GNU GPL. We urge people not to use the license
because of this incompatibility unless the provision in section 13 of
the MPL is exercised to provide the work under either the GPL or any
other GPL-compatible license"
It is exactly the same statement that is my problem too. But only in a
fairly remote region of licensing (creating Lazarus distributions with
components preinstalled).
It is easy to work around this using some "please click here" script that
does the final linking, but I prefered to have had a simple dual license
statement from Peter. Pity that he doesn't or doesn't want to understand the
issue.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem with MPL
- From: Peter Morris
- Re: Problem with MPL
- From: Peter Morris
- Re: Problem with MPL
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Problem with MPL
- References:
- New home required
- From: Peter Morris
- Re: New home required
- From: Marco van de Voort
- Re: New home required
- From: Peter Morris
- Re: New home required
- From: Thomas Miller
- Re: New home required
- From: Peter Morris
- Re: New home required
- From: Marco van de Voort
- Problem with MPL
- From: none
- New home required
- Prev by Date: Re: More on Unicode VCL
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with MPL
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem with MPL
- Next by thread: Re: Problem with MPL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|