Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Tony Caduto <tony.caduto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:38:30 -0600
Abdullah Kauchali wrote:
"Antti Kurenniemi""Ability to query databases on other servers local or remote" - that's a no-no for security reasons, don't want that!
Have you never used Linked Servers on SQL Server? Very convenient.
It's very convenient and fairly important for a Enterprise application.
For example, where I work we have a lot of vendor supplied M$ SQL servers. I like to do all my internal work in PGSQL as it's a waste of money to buy expensive M$ SQL licenses for the stuff we need internally.
Even MySQL can handle that for 99% of internal apps.
By using DBLINK_TDS, which provides access to MS SQL server from PostgreSQL I can pull in any data I need from the vendor supplied apps and write all my business logic in PLpgSQL stored procs/functions.
It's certainly not a no-no for security reasons.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Martijn Tonies
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Abdullah Kauchali
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- References:
- PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Tony Caduto
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Antti Kurenniemi
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Abdullah Kauchali
- PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- Prev by Date: Re: Older QC reports
- Next by Date: Re: Older QC reports
- Previous by thread: Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- Index(es):