Re: Older QC reports

"Patrick Moloney" wrote
I think QC has become a Negative rather than a
Positive factor for CodeGear.
When you put a tool like that out there, get (a
few) people to contribute, then ignore reports
for years

Thank goodness QC (QualityCentral) gives us a place
to submit and discuss our problem discoveries and
suggestions.

- well what do you expect.

Maybe a few whiners?

Despite the various comments here about resources,
priorities etc., if you don't have any intention
of responding to entries,

Patrick,
Above statement is too general to be useful. Do
you mean that CG has ignored one entry, which is
probably and justifiably true, or that CG ignores
all entries, which is easily proven to be false.

a tool like this should never see the light of
day. Kind of makes you wonder if this is just
data to be harvested internally when someone
wants to support their own position.

Patrick,
I am interested. Can you cite one example?

Rgds, JohnH
.

Relevant Pages