Re: Older QC reports

Patrick Moloney wrote:

John,
Let's let your "Whiners" accusation of me slide.

I've submitted a number of items to QC over at least 5 years. Some
have been fixed, some have been acknowledged. Most have not.

That is unfortunate, and probably the result of priorization, but not a
reason to call QC a failure, or a negative factor. QC is a valuable way
to communicate with CodeGear, and MANY issues in QC have been fixed or
taken into consideration.

There is one problem: items are transferred, by SysOps, from QC to
CodeGear's internal bug database. Bugs fixed are however not always
reported back as fixed to QC. But a stronger link between QC and the
internal database has been promised, and AFAIK, the interaction has
already improved.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]

"Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's
troublesome." -- Isaac Asimov
.