Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Tony Caduto <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:27:38 -0600
Martijn Tonies wrote:
Yet another mention of this "Enterprise" thing, without explaining what it
is...
I think people can find that out on there own, it's not difficult with wikipedia being around.
There are many definitions of what "Enterprise" means so it's best left to the reader to find the definition that fit's them best.
Firebird does fall into many of the definitions of what "Enterprise" means.
For some "Enterprise" class just means extremely robust and scales well.
It probably means something else to you since you keep bringing it up :-)
Later,
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Wayne Niddery \(TeamB\)
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Martijn Tonies
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- References:
- PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Tony Caduto
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Antti Kurenniemi
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Abdullah Kauchali
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Tony Caduto
- Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- From: Martijn Tonies
- PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- Prev by Date: Re: Selection of items on a form
- Next by Date: .NET 3.5 Final released
- Previous by thread: Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL and Firebird comparison via digg
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|