Re: Older QC reports

Craig Stuntz [TeamB] wrote:

The main point of my post was that the effect of QC has become
negative rather than positive for many users.

I don't have that impression.

Well, he said, "for many users." And I have no doubt that there are
many users who see QC as confirmation of their suspicions about this
or that.

You mean, such is human? <g>

Perhaps to some degree they're right. Openness shows flaws as
well as good things. "Openness" which only showed good things would
not be openness at all.

Sure.

Personally, whatever someone's suspicions, I think that the actual
effect of QC has been to get bugs fixed and features implemented which
otherwise might not have been done, and IMHO that makes it more than
worthwhile overall.

Indeed. You are not alone with that thought. <g>

--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]

"I don't feel good."
-- The last words of Luther Burbank (1849-1926)
.