Re: Older QC reports
- From: "Doug Chamberlin" <dougchamberlin at earthlink dot net>
- Date: 21 Nov 2007 15:17:00 -0700
Paul Scott wrote:
Already burned by past experiences of with QC, the large number of
reports not showing any resolution (not even a "fixed in the new
shiny version but not in the version you bought!" message) doesn't
inspire any enthusiasm to retry QC rather than Google Groups.
My own view is similar. It will take a lot to convince me that CG is
handling QC well enough to use it to report bugs or to look for bug
resolution info.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: Wayne Niddery \(TeamB\)
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Older QC reports
- References:
- Older QC reports
- From: Michael Fritz
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: Patrick Moloney
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: John Herbster
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: Patrick Moloney
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: Patrick Moloney
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: Wayne Niddery \(TeamB\)
- Re: Older QC reports
- From: Paul Scott
- Older QC reports
- Prev by Date: Re: Thanks for the Help Codegear
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi.NET and C# personality difference in compiled code
- Previous by thread: Re: Older QC reports
- Next by thread: Re: Older QC reports
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|