Re: Delphi or DNA?
- From: "John Jacobson" <jake@j[nospam]snewsreader.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:56:07 -0700
"Rolf Lampa [RIL]" <rolf.lampa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47806720$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It HAS been shown to have funtion. That "junk-DNA" which isn't really
'junk-DNA' has been shown to be
1. very
2. active
No, it hasn't been shown to do anything in replication, except act as a
buffer against the loss at the ends of the DNA strands. You are dead wrong
about this.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delphi or DNA?
- From: Rolf Lampa [RIL]
- Re: Delphi or DNA?
- References:
- Delphi or DNA?
- From: e1
- Re: Delphi or DNA?
- From: Farshad
- Re: Delphi or DNA?
- From: John Jacobson
- Re: Delphi or DNA?
- From: Rolf Lampa [RIL]
- Delphi or DNA?
- Prev by Date: Re: Delphi or DNA?
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi or DNA?
- Previous by thread: Re: Delphi or DNA?
- Next by thread: Re: Delphi or DNA?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|