Re: Garbage Collection
- From: "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:33:08 +0100
Mark A. Andrews wrote:
DS wrote:
That being said, with some effort - it works. Now.
Otherwise, for application of this magnitude, I'd be probably still
chasing memory leaks.
The BIG difference here is that YOU can FIX the memory leaks. You
have very little control over the gc.
The big difference is that he can also program for a non-determinisitic
GC, by thinking what an allocation means. Re-using allocations,
object-pools, etc. can relieve both kinds of code from memory concerns.
If memory issues are a problem, deterministic (in this case, determined
by the programmer) deallocation can also cost a lot of time, and cause
the same problems as he is describing.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://www.teamb.com
"The wit makes fun of other persons; the satirist makes fun of
the world; the humorist makes fun of himself."
-- James Thurber (1894-1961),
in Edward R. Murrow television interview
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Garbage Collection
- From: Marco van de Voort
- Re: Garbage Collection
- References:
- Garbage Collection
- From: Sanyin
- Re: Garbage Collection
- From: Mark A. Andrews
- Re: Garbage Collection
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Garbage Collection
- From: Cesar Romero
- Re: Garbage Collection
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Garbage Collection
- From: DS
- Re: Garbage Collection
- From: Mark A. Andrews
- Garbage Collection
- Prev by Date: Re: Garbage Collection
- Next by Date: Re: Garbage Collection
- Previous by thread: Re: Garbage Collection
- Next by thread: Re: Garbage Collection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|