Re: What can we call such a framework
- From: Yogi Yang 007 <yogiyang007@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:22:02 +0530
.NET assembliesI don't know much about this approach but can it be version independent? I think not, as all the assemblies will be dependent on the version on which they were built.
DLLsI have never used this approach but do you think it is practically possible? What would happen if the core is built in Delphi 6, a the modules are build as DLLs in VC++ 6 or LCC 'C'?
Delphi PackagesHere again version dependency will mare the advantage this framework.
I feel currently COM is the best way to go as there will be no problems in String handling, etc. etc. as compared to the DLL approach.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What can we call such a framework
- From: Marc Rohloff [TeamB]
- Re: What can we call such a framework
- References:
- What can we call such a framework
- From: Yogi Yang 007
- Re: What can we call such a framework
- From: Remy Lebeau \(TeamB\)
- Re: What can we call such a framework
- From: Remy Lebeau \(TeamB\)
- Re: What can we call such a framework
- From: Yogi Yang 007
- Re: What can we call such a framework
- From: Marc Rohloff [TeamB]
- What can we call such a framework
- Prev by Date: Re: What can we call such a framework
- Next by Date: Re: Provide an official wrapper for LibPNG
- Previous by thread: Re: What can we call such a framework
- Next by thread: Re: What can we call such a framework
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|