Re: GPL question
- From: Tony Caduto <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:16:21 -0500
Uwe wrote:
Still struggling with the GPL... . Let's say I have a DLL, which is based on code that also falls under the GPL. My program may link into this DLL on demand on app start to use its functionality (pretty much like a plugin). If I provide the source code for the DLL, do I fulfill the terms of the GPL or do I have to disclose the source of my application as well?
I tend to believe that I don't have to. Just think of a Photoshop plugin that was developed under the GPL. Nobody can force Adobe to disclose its source, even if I use the plugin with this closed-source, commercial application.
Thanks for any insight
Uwe
DLLs fall under the GPL.
It's best to try and find opensource stuff with LGPL or BSD licenses which don't require you to release any source code when linking to a DLL.
Later,
Tony Caduto
AM Softwaredesign
Home of Lightning Admin for PostgreSQL and MySQL
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL question
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: GPL question
- References:
- GPL question
- From: Uwe
- GPL question
- Prev by Date: Re: Selling Software
- Next by Date: Re: Why German user should not buy Vista
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL question
- Next by thread: Re: GPL question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|